Supporting the strikes

on Wednesday, 10 March 2010

The Tories, CBI and Liberal Democrats have been quick to question and undermine the current PCS strike over civil service redundancy changes. Credit must go to the Welsh Government AMs from Labour and Plaid Cymru for backing the workers in their dispute with the UK Government. We are now entering a crucial political period in which issues of principle are more important than ever. A focus on process issues (like the delay in Assembly business) or on dividing public sector workers against private sector workers risks completely distracting peoples' attention from the wider issue at hand which is New Labour's ongoing war against civil servants. An FSB spokesperson tweeted that he was unhappy that the Western Mail had run a headline saying the FSB had 'no sympathy' with public sector workers over this dispute. The FSB do not support the strike (nor is it in their remit to do so) but they certainly wouldn't want to be dividing workers against each other or fuelling the myths that the public sector is some kind of gold-plated workers' paradise. It's an economic recession not a cattle auction. If too many salaries are lost from the public sector, it will have a knock-on effect on the wider economy and surely that won't be good for private business.


There is still some waste in the public sector that can and needs to be reduced, but those kind of cuts are only acceptable if done in line with cutting the highest salaries of the questionable non-jobs that appear to have proliferated during the past ten years (as Dr. Eurfyl ap Gwilym argued). That more balanced approach would surely go down alot better with PCS members, who are hardly taking industrial action for no reason. Any discussion about the validity of the strike should also recognise that the scrapping of these civil service redundancy packages (packages hard-won by some of the lowest paid workers who traditionally supported the party which is now abolishing them) was planned before the financial crisis, before the recession and before there was any question of public expenditure being cut.

It's entirely justifiable for Assembly business to be disrupted momentarily in order to show solidarity with these workers. The debate about cuts is one that needs these kind of actions to remind us of what is at stake. The few conditions that workers do enjoy in the UK have been won by this kind of industrial action being available. The Tories and Lib Dems are wrong in arguing that politicians should not support these strikes, but that should be no surprise.

3 comments:

Welsh Left said...

"Which side are you on" goes a famous american workers song.

Labour AMs might well have backed this strike, but it is Labour MPs who came up with the attack on the workers.

Someone made this point to Edwina Hart at the Swansea Rally. Her support is welcome but ultimately means little unless she withdraws her support for candidates who want to implement this anti-worker policy.

There are thousands of trade union members in Wales. They should remember at election time, when choosing their MP, that Plaid has never supported these attacks on pay and conditions- and we can say that with pride, whether we're talking about Plaid AMs or Plaid MPs. Unlike Labour who may as well be two different parties.

Pelagius said...

Agreed "Welsh Left". So why do some Plaid people insist on allying with Labour Brits? As this blog has pointed out ad nausium, there is no "Welsh Labour". Even St Rhodri is a British Nationalist, e.g. Iraq. It just confirms my thesis that Cardiff Bay weakens Plaid Cymru which, of course, it was designed to do. When Plaid AMs accept encomiums from Brit Labour, they weaken the national movement. So many are being sucked in by celebrity status. Look e.g. at their blogs. Gwynfor never fell for it.

Welsh Ramblings said...

I see it differently Pelagius. Plaid is heavily involved in the Assembly and their participation in government has coincided with the Assembly becoming more popular than ever. The signature Plaid policy of additional powers is possibly the single most popular policy the current Welsh Government is advocating, and for the first time now commands an absolute majority in successive opinion polls.

A significant part of Welsh Labour are not Labour Brits. People like Carwyn Jones, Rhodri Morgan, John Griffiths, Edwina Hart, Leslie Griffiths etc are people that are pro-Welsh and have no emotional attachment to the UK, but believe the UK system works. It is completely acceptable to forge alliances with these people in order to strengthen devolution. It is working. Plaid is not being noticeably weakened by this process, and more people are coming over (Ron Davies?). People that in the past would not have touched Plaid with a barge-pole.

My own take (purely personal view) is that Plaid is a long-term project to become an all-Wales party. At the moment they are not. There are significantly populated parts of Wales where Plaid barely operates. When Plaid's base and intellectual armoury expands, they will then be able to take on Labour and win.

For now, they are doing a very effective job of steering devolution forward.

You can forget about independence if the Assembly fails or becomes a disliked institution. The devolution road is the correct one, as long as it goes hand in hand with working in our communities, because that's where Plaid as a movement will be built.

It's Welsh Labour, not Plaid, who need to be challenged. Do they want to continue to align themselves to New Labour, or do they want to move in a more progressive direction (like a Welsh SDLP). Time to cut the apron strings.