Tale of two nations

on Tuesday, 16 March 2010

Both Scotland and Wales now have their own Governments, and extremely progressive and radical energy policies have been a defining feature of devolution in both countries. This week there have been announcements in both nations about the future of renewable energy, but while Scotland advances towards a low-carbon future, Wales will be held back from achieving the same thing because of new plans by Labour at Westminster to effectively privatise major planning decisions in Wales.


In Wales, Environment Minister Jane Davidson has this week scaled up our already ambitious plans for renewable energy. It is a great statement of intent from an administration that has the support of Welsh Ramblings, but it is unfortunately an ambition that is ultimately beyond the remit of the weak devolution settlement we have. Shamefully, Westminster has deliberately excluded planning permissions for energy installations greater than 50 MW from the Welsh devolution settlement- similar to how they have excluded Welsh people from controlling their own water and other natural resources. This is very reminiscent of the age of imperialism where the colonial power retains control over the subsumed nation's resources, and exploits them. But that digression aside, the Scottish settlement devolves all energy planning to Holyrood. Frankly, this is our fault for not presenting a strong enough national movement, whereas in Scotland the British Government felt threatened enough to recognise in a declassified report that an independent Scotland would have become one of the strongest economies in Europe.

Previously, the Welsh Government had argued that Wales has enough potential to create all of its energy from renewable sources, in the very forward-thinking Renewable Energy Route Map. Despite the positive outcome, the Route Map was based entirely on factors beyond the Welsh Government's control becoming reality such as a Severn tidal energy project (final decision with Westminster), and the extremely questionable Prenergy Biomass Plant at Port Talbot.

Jane Davidson has now stated that in the next 10 to 15 years alone there is potential or £50bn worth of renewable energy projects in Wales, with the eventual reality that Wales could produce twice as much of its energy needs from renewables. We could become a major European exporter of renewable energy. Jane Davidson is a Labour Minister and does not support Wales becoming an independent state as far as we know, but surely a Wales that generated such a windfall of clean energy could sustain its economic needs by selling that energy to an increasingly hungry global market?

Because Wales does not have the planning and fiscal powers to develop a Welsh clean energy industry, our progress will be hampered. Westminster's priorities will take precedence, and on current form that is not good news for Welsh communities, in terms of both Labour and the Tories being indistinguishable on supporting a Severn Barrage (ignoring and undermining the alternatives) and "fake renewables" like the huge biomass plant at Port Talbot. For a nation that already generates more energy than we use, we should be innovating our energy sources much more so that we can create high-quality jobs and supply-side companies, rather than simply producing cheap energy for the needs of England.

An unhealthy side-note is the Labour Westminster Government's rush to create a new undemocratic quango (the Infrastructure Planning Commission) to control decisions over energy, including decisions in Wales. They will abolish public enquiries into major planning decisions and replace them with limited hearings. There is something sinister about these plans and the fact they will be imposed on Wales is a sad indictment of the generations of politicians that have failed us. Though this has become something of a trending topic amongst nationalists who have traditionally concerned themselves with keeping Westminster's hands of our resources, it's Friends of the Earth who will be mounting a legal challenge against these neo-liberal plans. It is obvious that New Labour are taking planning decisions away from elected politicians, so that the whims of the market can decide them. For a so-called socialist party to be pushing this through is hideously ironic. The SNP and Plaid Cymru are clearly the ones actually upholding socialist principles in this case, as there are no such plans to introduce an IPC in Scotland.

The alternative is clear. In Scotland, whose Government contrastingly has much more powers over energy than we do, First Minister Alex Salmond is talking about parts of his country being "the Saudi Arabia of renewable energy", presumably without the widespread oppression of women! In seriousness, it is an exceptional vision, especially when you consider the fact that Scottish nationalism has traditionally been based on demands around oil. Though Scotland should of course still get control of its own oil, the SNP government is positioning their country as the green engine of Europe. This is an incredibly dynamic vision and one we could quite easily emulate. Our wind and wave energy potential offshore is hugely significant and could help save the planet and lead to a more prosperous and fairer future. Yet we lack both the fiscal/regulatory and energy powers. But there's nothing to say we can't campaign to get those levers in the future.

We must start making an economic case for independence as a long-term aspiration, ready to argue it in ten or fifteen years' time when these energy projects come online. To allow the colonial-style exploitation of our resources without getting any direct benefit from them would be a betrayal of our people. On the bright side, it does look like Wales will eventually become viable as an independent nation, in terms of being prepared for the low-carbon future.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Welsh Ramblings once a good blog now a wierd unending conspiracy theory about imperialism and colonisation! We want our water back is so 1960s. We've moved on.

Welsh Ramblings said...

It isn't a conspiracy theory Anon it's a legitimate concern with Friends of the Earth are seriously investigating.

Bugger said...

The SNP Government will host a major World Conference later this year on renewable energy

See beow
http://tinyurl.com/yjqalo6

The talk is a of European infrastructure funding to help make an electrical interconnector between Scotland and Norway in equilibrate peaks and troughs in energy generation in the two countries and to get round the connector charges through England which are based on distance from London! So renewable energy fro Scotland is penalised whilst a nuclear plant on the Thames would be subsidised per KwH generated, even if the electricity was used in the North of Scotland. Nits but calculatedly so.

Marxy said...

You don't get more socialist than "commanding heights of the economy", comrade, and there is no better contemporary expression of this philosophy than the Infrastructure Planning Commission.

Welsh Ramblings said...

Don't think you quite get it Marxy, the commanding heights will certainly not be taken under control of the people by the IPC! The word "Independent" in this case is more likely to mean corporate and private interests. In fact its unaccountable to the public and to workers so in no way is it socialist- though I suspect you're having a laugh in which case fair do's.

Plaid Panteg said...

The status of Wales' natural resources is a national scandal in these post devolutionary times.

We are having decisions taken by Westminster that have implications for decades. This in unacceptable.

Will blog about this tomorrow.

Welsh Left said...

It certainly does get the conspiracies going but what do you expect when Hain's Government of Wales Act deliberately prevents water from being controlled by Wales?

It's exactly how Ramblings calls it, imperialism as the highest form of capitalism. Now the problem is many independent nations have full sovereignty and control of their own resources, but in privatising them have lost any direct benefits.

Bolivia is a prime example. Under privatisation (ironically of water and natural gas) it became the most impoverished state in Latin America. Under Evo Morales' indigenous government they have regained control of the hydrocarbons and water. Foreign companies are still involved but they must pay much fairer rates for exploiting the resources. Bolivia has now removed the ills of disease, malnutrition and illiteracy as a result of this.

Wales is not starting from such a disadvantaged position, so here full scale nationalisation wouldn't be required (though I personally would advocate it, it would not be compatible with EU membership).

tris said...

Good post. You need more power in Cardiff, and we need more in Edinburgh.

Then perhaps we can stop being last at everything except crime, prison populations, drugs and underage pregnancy...

Would be nice to be like the rest of Europe.....

Welsh Ramblings said...

Nice to hear from some comrades in Scotland.

The promised land is in sight.

Bugger said...

From last nights Politics Scotland vis SCOT goes POP blog


First, it was pointed out in a straightforward factual way that it costs £21 per kilowatt to connect this new source of renewable energy to the National Grid from the north of Scotland, whereas in Cornwall you would actually be paid £6 per kilowatt for your trouble.

Note we are charged £21 to send a Kw to London and fro Cornwall there is a £6 rebate. Nothing agianst Cornwall but this shows you how the odds on renewable, in fact all, energy are stacked against Scotland and for Big Nuclear.

I bet you didn't know that one of James Gordon Brown's brothers was, aybe is, Director of Public Relations for the French Nuclear Energy generator EDF who are the chosen ones to repower England and Wales.

The Long Island holidays that Brown used to take were in a rented house in The Hamptons.

Guess who rented the house?

Welsh Ramblings said...

Thanks for those notes about Scotland. Surely it will strengthen your economic case for independence.

We need a similar case to be made in Wales, in relation to all these energy developments.

Doug Daniel said...

Thanks for those notes about Scotland. Surely it will strengthen your economic case for independence.

You would think so, but the problem is the Scottish media allow lies and half-truths to persist in Scotland, so that many otherwise intelligent people fall for the unionist line that Scotland doesn't have the wealth or resources to survive on its own, to the point that expressing a view that Scotland would be better off on its own is sometimes met with the sort of reaction you'd expect Gordon Brown to get if he addressed a Tory conference saying he was going to raise taxes to pay for extra child-benefit for single parents.

Scotland and Wales both have something many countries in Europe don't: a coastline. It would be ridiculous not to use it to our advantage. The only problem is that in years to come, if the union still exists, it'll be Scottish and Welsh renewable energy propping up the UK economy, rather than the current Scottish oil. Will Scotland and Wales get the benefits? No. Colonies in the British Empire never saw the benefits of their sugar cane etc, and we'll never see the benefits of our resources under the Union either. Hopefully Scottish independence isn't too far off, and then we can help you guys escape from the Union as well.

Ak said...

Yeah, go for it Wales, you should sell energy to England at a fair price for yourselves whether your independent or still a part of the UK.

If Wales was independent I doubt you could be an "energy superpower", but you'd be able to sell a lot to England. However you'd also be competing with Scotland probably as well.

As someone has mentioned already, the whole water debate is pretty old.
Wales only really supplies some of England with water quite simply because its more convenient.
England more has more than enough water for itself, but here's the point - which area full of water is closest to Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham? - Wales.
Whilst water for these areas could come from Northwest England it is simply easier to get it from Wales. Like with Welsh electricity, I belive this should be sold to England at a fair price.

England should have its own parliament, as should Wales (i.e. The assembly isn't sufficient) and the UK should take on a more federal structure.

(By the way i'm English)